Football Betting Master Final Review Summary
Rating: 
Hi Bloggers,
I have been watching over this product for the last 2 months
The review has now come to an end and again with much promise but not too much on the delivery side.
The service involved betting on the under/over 2.5 goals market.
We finished the trial on figures of + 1167.50 pts from a starting bank of 1000 pts
so an overall flat stake profit of + 167.50 pts over the 8 weeks.
As our average stake was around 50 pts, that basically breaks down
to + 3.35 pts at level stakes.
Again not a complete failure but hardly reason for booking those flights
to Acapulco either!
This again may need a longer study to fully realise any potential but, in agreement
with James, we feel there is little point in extending the review past the 56 day
mark.
So I shall place this service into the Neutral section pending possible
further enquiries.
Rating: –
[Click Here To See Football Betting Master]
All the best, Tommy.
Filed under Betting System Reviews by on Jul 25th, 2010. 
The Combination System Final Review Summary
Rating: 
Alas we come to the end of another system review which again promised much but
failed to deliver any real profit to speak of over the last 8 weeks.
In fact our finishing total comes to + 70.35 pts, so we have managed to glean
a tiny profit of + 0.35 pts over the 2 months.
The author does state however that the system should be used for the whole of
the flat season, so I will personally be keeping an eye on what happens for the
next few months and of course keep you bloggers updated if any major profits
start appearing regularly!
The system itself was very easy to use and selections could be found quickly,
a few minutes, after perusing the Racing Post. There may also have been a case
made for having some E/W bets instead of the straight win as a few of the
selections did place at some big prices. However the system is simply based
on straight win bets and these have failed to materialise successfully over the period.
Altogether we had 41 selections with just 11 wins.
So not a total failure overall but not exactly blowing us all away in profit either
at the end of the day.
For that reason I shall be putting the system in the Neutral section pending
further investigation as the season continues.
Rating:
[Click Here To See The Combination System]
All the best, Tommy.
Filed under Betting System Reviews by on Jul 25th, 2010.
Neutral Pending Further Review
Rating: 
Hi Blogger’s
I have been reviewing the Pin Point Lays since April 18thand all three services have suffered from non runners and outside of odds range selections. On Day 56 I decided to extend the trial as the service operator told me he was trying to adapt his methods to bring about an increase in the number of selections this would affect Low Lays and Bankers, not the Bullet Lays. Anyway lets see what happened below I have given the results for all three services and split these results into three sections for Overall, Days 1 to 56 and finally Days 57 to 84.
|
|
Low Lays Overall Results |
|
||
|
Selections |
Winning Lays |
Strike Rate |
Level Stake |
5% Liability |
|
29 |
22 |
75.86% |
Minus 5.56 |
Minus 5.49 |
|
|
Low Lays Days 1 to 56 Results |
|
||
|
Selections |
Winning Lays |
Strike Rate |
Level Stake |
5% Liability |
|
17 |
11 |
64.71% |
Minus 12.01 |
Minus 16.21 |
|
|
Low Lays Days 57 to 84 Results |
|
||
|
Selections |
Winning Lays |
Strike Rate |
Level Stake |
5% Liability |
|
12 |
11 |
91.66% |
Plus 6.45 |
Plus 10.72 |
|
|
Banker Lays Overall Results |
|
|
|
|
Selections |
Winning Lays |
Strike Rate |
Level Stake |
5% Liability |
|
29 |
24 |
75.86% |
Plus 4.82 |
Plus 7.01 |
|
|
Banker Lays Days 1 to 56 Results |
|
|
|
|
Selections |
Winning Lays |
Strike Rate |
Level Stake |
5% Liability |
|
18 |
14 |
77.76% |
Minus 0.68 |
Minus 4.46 |
|
|
Banker Lays Days 57 to 84 Results |
|
|
|
|
Selections |
Winning Lays |
Strike Rate |
Level Stake |
5% Liability |
|
11 |
10 |
90.91% |
Plus 5.50 |
Plus 11.47 |
|
|
Bullet Lays Overall Results |
|
|
|
|
Selections |
Winning Lays |
Strike Rate |
Level Stake |
5% Liability |
|
24 |
12 |
50.00% |
Minus 0.48 |
Minus 3.07 |
|
|
Bullet Lays Days 1 to 56 Results |
|
|
|
|
Selections |
Winning Lays |
Strike Rate |
Level Stake |
5% Liability |
|
17 |
7 |
41.12% |
Minus 3.25 |
Minus 15.58 |
|
|
Bullet Lays Days 57 to 84 Results |
|
|
|
|
Selections |
Winning Lays |
Strike Rate |
Level Stake |
5% Liability |
|
7 |
5 |
71.43% |
Plus 2.77 |
Plus 12.51 |
Well certainly things picked up in the numbers game all three services making profits in the last 4 weeks of the review and an increase in the number of selections for Low Lays which is the flagship of the group, and to a lesser extent the Banker Lays. Bullet Lays was slightly down in selections but certainly the strike rate was up. So it would seem that the service operator’s changes had an effect on the results. Now of course 4 weeks is not long enough for me to make a decision but I do feel that with the improvement in the last third the service deserves another chance therefore I am placing this in the neutral.
Just to conclude as can be seen to Level Stakes Low Lays made a loss of 5.56 points
, Banker Lays made a profit of 4.82 points and Bullet Lays almost broke even this was for the whole review. In the last 4 weeks from a total of just 30 selections for all 3 services a profit of 14.72 points was made which is quite respectable for laying, if this service had performed like this from the start it would have been in a different category.
[You can see Pin Point Lays Here] – Rating:
Regards
Sgt Dave
Filed under Betting System Reviews by on Jul 20th, 2010.
Follow The Fortunes – Review Summary
Rating:
Hello All,
Welcome to the long overdue final review of Follow The Fortunes…
Follow The Fortunes is brought to us by author Roger Purssord and is sold via Sportsworld Publishing. The system is a combination of Back and Lay bets, the idea is to Back and Lay two different selections in each race.
During the trial I separated the system out into 3 for monitoring, they were:
Back Bets only
Lay Bets only
The System as a whole (Both Back & Lays bets)
The system produced a profit overall, but please do not get fooled by looking at the profit, here are the stats for each:
Average odds…..3.39
Strike Rate……..35.39%
R.O.I……………0.89%
Highest Odds……8.02 (averaged)
Lowest Odds……1.30 (averaged)
Total Stakes (risk) £647 @ £1 per bet.
PROFIT MADE – +5.13pts
So when we look at the above stats, we would actually get a better return by putting our money in a High St bank. The strike rate is too low to make long term consistent profit.
Average odds…..6.18
Strike Rate……..86.82%
R.O.L…………..2.46%
Highest Odds……11.00 (averaged)
Lowest Odds……2.73 (averaged)
Total Stakes (risk) £3746.74 @ £1 per bet.
PROFIT MADE – +92.09pts
The Lays provided the vast majority of the overall profit, whilst it had many 100% days it also had 2 really bad days, the losses sustained on those days was -31.77pts and -17.62. The average losing days were -5pts.
Strike Rate……..61.07%
Highest Odds……11.00 (averaged)
Lowest Odds……1.30 (averaged)
PROFIT MADE – +97.22pts
The system as it is intended to be followed made good profits overall, the Lays as previously stated providing the overwhelming majority of the profit.
How Much does it cost?
There are 3 options that you can invest in, each offering different levels, they are:
£195, this buys you the manual explaining what the rules are and how you can use them to gain the desired selections. This is the cheapest option, but is labour intensive and is not suited to people who do not have the time due to other commitments.
This is the LIVE service and costs £50pm. For this you get access to a daily master race sheet via a members area, this contains the possible races for the day. You are then asked to logon and watch each race 5 minutes before the off where the author Roger will guide you on each bet. Again this is labour intensive as it requires you to be by your PC for a lot of the day. It is suited however for people who want to learn more about why certain bets are made and others not.
After your third months subscription you will be sent a copy of the manual (Option 1) free of charge, which actually makes Option 2 a cheaper way to get Option 1!!
Sportworld are offering your 1st month at half price at the moment- £25 1st month only, cancel at any time.
This method is subject to Roger being at his PC and therefore continuous service is only guaranteed to be 25 days per month.
A whopping £75pm!! The payment is £50pm for the selections themselves and £25pm for the software. This is the method I used. There were a number of discrepancies with regards to Option 3 selections and Option 2 selections which were pointed out by subscribers to the system. All I can say is that I know how the software works and Roger would have had to put the selections up for end customers to get them, so they were correct for Option 3, there were quite a few selections that were bet on twice again this can be caused by errors from the author in the daily programming of the bot itself, it’s easy to do, I have done it myself accidentally.
After your third months subscription you will be sent a copy of the manual (Option 1) free of charge.
Sportworld are offering your 1st month at half price at the moment- £37.50 1st month only, cancel at any time.
This method is the best one for people who do not want to, or do not want to spend all day at their PC.
I don’t feel at home in giving my full backing to this system; its return on investment is very low indeed, caused mainly by the poor performance of the Back bets. I cannot say it hasn’t worked either +97pts in 3 months is a good return, which is refreshing for a Sportsworld product. However the monthly fees of Option 1 (£50pm) and Option 3 (£75) are somewhat prohibitive to people with minimal betting banks.
I would recommend anyone following this system have a bank of at least £500 and use a 200pt level stake, so the net profit for each option would be as follows:
£2.50 times 97.22 = £243.05 gross profit
Subscription fee = £195.
Nett profit after 3 months = £48.05
£2.50 times 97.22 = £243.05 gross profit
Subscription fee = £150.
Nett profit after 3 months = £93.05
£2.50 times 97.22 = £243.05 gross profit
Subscription fee = £225.
Nett profit after 3 months = £18.05
So as you can see from the above, you do not get much return for your total investment from using a safe staking method. So I give this system a NEUTRAL review, it works, but higher strike rates and better performances from the Back selections are required.
[Click here to see Follow The Fortunes...]
Rating:
Kind Regards
Ian Morris
Filed under Betting System Reviews by on Jul 16th, 2010.
One Good Bet Review Summary
Rating:
Hi Bloggers
Rather than dress up this review summary, let’s just say this has to be one of the all
time flops in my time reviewing systems over the last two years.
53 days produced just 19 bets of which NONE were winning doubles and only eight
involved place wins. However as most of these place doubles included unplaced runners,
the returns were often less than the stake!
The system is far too woolly and open to subjectivity. For example the ebook gives
various Racing Post data to analyse to arrive at the selections but finishes by saying:
“The final decision has to have a certain amount of personal judgement factored into it”
So, basically if you are not sure if your selections are the best available just go with your
gut instinct! I certainly don’t consider paying £95 to represent good value just to end
up having to use my own judgement!!
Another interesting development is that Sportsworld Publishing have pulled the sales
page so even if you are foolish enough to want to invest in the system, you can’t do so
now anyway.
(I also noticed Lay It Safe has been pulled by Sportsworld as well. Must be the power of
Betting System Truths in exposing these nonsense services!)
As one of our readers commented on this review earlier, Maybe the title “One Good Bet”
means one good bet in the Flat season!! Unfortunately, after two months – almost half
way through the season – we are still waiting for it to happen.
Without hesitation, I recommend One Good Bet is FAILED and JAILED
indefinitely.
52 days / 19 bets with cumulative P/L - 12.47 points
[Click Here To See That One Good Bet Has Been Removed From Sportsworld Publishing!]
Cheers
Sgt Jon
Rating:
Filed under Passed and Recommended by on Jul 2nd, 2010.
Neutral Pending Further Review
Rating:
[Click here for Footballing prophets...]
Hi Bloggers,
Unfortunately the review has to be shelved until the start of next season. We will pick up from where we left off at that time. Martin had stated previously that Footballing Prophets may send selections out for Australian soccer matches in the closed UK season.
Footballing Prophets have not decided to go ahead with that idea and have chosen to continue to test their theories which will hopefully result in Australian selections being sent out at the end of next season.
I have therefore decided to suspend the review with the label of Neutral pending further trial. The service has been reviewed for 69 days since 8th March 2010. It is not able to satisfy the full trial period of 84 days. So even though the results have not lived up to expectations, it would not be proper to fail it at this stage without giving it the full attention it deserves.
[Click here for Footballing prophets...]
Cheers
Ian Morris
Filed under Betting System Reviews by on May 18th, 2010.
Lay The Ratings
[Click Here To See Lay The Ratings...]
Rating:
This is my final review of Lay The Ratings.
I want to start by saying that I have Passed Lay The Ratings and It becomes 1 in only 3 systems/services to make the grade at the moment. As you know we regularly update our categories so that there is never stale information on the blog.
Our trial started on the 24th January this year and has now ended on the 24th April which means out test lasted 90 whole betting days.
We received 430 selections by email and from those we had 355 winning selections. So the strike rate was 82.56% overall for the trial.
The average price that we layed at in the trial was 6.59 BFSP (Betfair SP) based on 430 selections. This in my opinion comes under the category of a safe laying formula.
The Return on Investment when calculated to your total outlay is not actually that bad, but I am not doing cartwheels at 11% . Do not let this obscure the final outcome though as this does not tell the full story. Although the ROI is 11% for total outlay this is just a figure touted in comparison to how much outlay you have had over the 3 months and I would have to say that this figure on this occasion is not that important.
The True ROI is what sort of bank size would have been needed to Truly make the decent money and I can say with a bank of £100 you would be now sitting on £143.56 this is a True Return on initial investment of 43.56%, do this 4 times a year to total 12 months and you are not doing to badly at all. The average punter that lays uses between a 500 – 1000 starting capital in my experience and the money you can make is detailed below for the various starting capitals.
£100 = £143.56
£300 = £430.68
£500 = £717.80
£1000 = £1,435.60
£2000 = £2,871.20
£5000 = £7,178
£10000 = £14,356
The author has asked if he can keep proofing his selections to me for the foreseeable future as it helps him to keep good track on his results and in doing so I will continue to keep a close eye on Lay the Ratings and further analysis will of course follow as it does with all passed systems/services.
Lay The Ratings gets the Big Thumbs up and I recommend it to blog readers
[Click Here To See Lay The Ratings...]
Rating:
Filed under Passed and Recommended by on Apr 24th, 2010.