Bet Science Review Scam?
Bet Science is supposedly Powerful, Professional and Profitable.
Do I think Bet Science will live up to its claims?
Bet-Science, the acclaimed professional grade betting system that applies the power of a little unknown bookmaking mathematics to make planned, calculated, professional bets.
They say that If you are looking to turn around your current betting path you should make backing horses, football and sports events far more profitable and get in on the secret world of a bookmaker.
To take a look at Bet Science please follow this link [Click Here]
Please come back regularly to check up on our 1 month review of Bet Science!
please read on to find out more about the innovative and powerful Bet Science betting system.
Filed under Betting System Reviews by on Sep 28th, 2010. 
Neutral Pending Further Review
Rating: 
Hi Blogger’s
I have been reviewing the Pin Point Lays since April 18thand all three services have suffered from non runners and outside of odds range selections. On Day 56 I decided to extend the trial as the service operator told me he was trying to adapt his methods to bring about an increase in the number of selections this would affect Low Lays and Bankers, not the Bullet Lays. Anyway lets see what happened below I have given the results for all three services and split these results into three sections for Overall, Days 1 to 56 and finally Days 57 to 84.
|
|
Low Lays Overall Results |
|
||
|
Selections |
Winning Lays |
Strike Rate |
Level Stake |
5% Liability |
|
29 |
22 |
75.86% |
Minus 5.56 |
Minus 5.49 |
|
|
Low Lays Days 1 to 56 Results |
|
||
|
Selections |
Winning Lays |
Strike Rate |
Level Stake |
5% Liability |
|
17 |
11 |
64.71% |
Minus 12.01 |
Minus 16.21 |
|
|
Low Lays Days 57 to 84 Results |
|
||
|
Selections |
Winning Lays |
Strike Rate |
Level Stake |
5% Liability |
|
12 |
11 |
91.66% |
Plus 6.45 |
Plus 10.72 |
|
|
Banker Lays Overall Results |
|
|
|
|
Selections |
Winning Lays |
Strike Rate |
Level Stake |
5% Liability |
|
29 |
24 |
75.86% |
Plus 4.82 |
Plus 7.01 |
|
|
Banker Lays Days 1 to 56 Results |
|
|
|
|
Selections |
Winning Lays |
Strike Rate |
Level Stake |
5% Liability |
|
18 |
14 |
77.76% |
Minus 0.68 |
Minus 4.46 |
|
|
Banker Lays Days 57 to 84 Results |
|
|
|
|
Selections |
Winning Lays |
Strike Rate |
Level Stake |
5% Liability |
|
11 |
10 |
90.91% |
Plus 5.50 |
Plus 11.47 |
|
|
Bullet Lays Overall Results |
|
|
|
|
Selections |
Winning Lays |
Strike Rate |
Level Stake |
5% Liability |
|
24 |
12 |
50.00% |
Minus 0.48 |
Minus 3.07 |
|
|
Bullet Lays Days 1 to 56 Results |
|
|
|
|
Selections |
Winning Lays |
Strike Rate |
Level Stake |
5% Liability |
|
17 |
7 |
41.12% |
Minus 3.25 |
Minus 15.58 |
|
|
Bullet Lays Days 57 to 84 Results |
|
|
|
|
Selections |
Winning Lays |
Strike Rate |
Level Stake |
5% Liability |
|
7 |
5 |
71.43% |
Plus 2.77 |
Plus 12.51 |
Well certainly things picked up in the numbers game all three services making profits in the last 4 weeks of the review and an increase in the number of selections for Low Lays which is the flagship of the group, and to a lesser extent the Banker Lays. Bullet Lays was slightly down in selections but certainly the strike rate was up. So it would seem that the service operator’s changes had an effect on the results. Now of course 4 weeks is not long enough for me to make a decision but I do feel that with the improvement in the last third the service deserves another chance therefore I am placing this in the neutral.
Just to conclude as can be seen to Level Stakes Low Lays made a loss of 5.56 points
, Banker Lays made a profit of 4.82 points and Bullet Lays almost broke even this was for the whole review. In the last 4 weeks from a total of just 30 selections for all 3 services a profit of 14.72 points was made which is quite respectable for laying, if this service had performed like this from the start it would have been in a different category.
[You can see Pin Point Lays Here] – Rating:
Regards
Sgt Dave
Filed under Betting System Reviews by on Jul 20th, 2010.
Follow The Fortunes – Review Summary
Rating:
Hello All,
Welcome to the long overdue final review of Follow The Fortunes…
Follow The Fortunes is brought to us by author Roger Purssord and is sold via Sportsworld Publishing. The system is a combination of Back and Lay bets, the idea is to Back and Lay two different selections in each race.
During the trial I separated the system out into 3 for monitoring, they were:
Back Bets only
Lay Bets only
The System as a whole (Both Back & Lays bets)
The system produced a profit overall, but please do not get fooled by looking at the profit, here are the stats for each:
Average odds…..3.39
Strike Rate……..35.39%
R.O.I……………0.89%
Highest Odds……8.02 (averaged)
Lowest Odds……1.30 (averaged)
Total Stakes (risk) £647 @ £1 per bet.
PROFIT MADE – +5.13pts
So when we look at the above stats, we would actually get a better return by putting our money in a High St bank. The strike rate is too low to make long term consistent profit.
Average odds…..6.18
Strike Rate……..86.82%
R.O.L…………..2.46%
Highest Odds……11.00 (averaged)
Lowest Odds……2.73 (averaged)
Total Stakes (risk) £3746.74 @ £1 per bet.
PROFIT MADE – +92.09pts
The Lays provided the vast majority of the overall profit, whilst it had many 100% days it also had 2 really bad days, the losses sustained on those days was -31.77pts and -17.62. The average losing days were -5pts.
Strike Rate……..61.07%
Highest Odds……11.00 (averaged)
Lowest Odds……1.30 (averaged)
PROFIT MADE – +97.22pts
The system as it is intended to be followed made good profits overall, the Lays as previously stated providing the overwhelming majority of the profit.
How Much does it cost?
There are 3 options that you can invest in, each offering different levels, they are:
£195, this buys you the manual explaining what the rules are and how you can use them to gain the desired selections. This is the cheapest option, but is labour intensive and is not suited to people who do not have the time due to other commitments.
This is the LIVE service and costs £50pm. For this you get access to a daily master race sheet via a members area, this contains the possible races for the day. You are then asked to logon and watch each race 5 minutes before the off where the author Roger will guide you on each bet. Again this is labour intensive as it requires you to be by your PC for a lot of the day. It is suited however for people who want to learn more about why certain bets are made and others not.
After your third months subscription you will be sent a copy of the manual (Option 1) free of charge, which actually makes Option 2 a cheaper way to get Option 1!!
Sportworld are offering your 1st month at half price at the moment- £25 1st month only, cancel at any time.
This method is subject to Roger being at his PC and therefore continuous service is only guaranteed to be 25 days per month.
A whopping £75pm!! The payment is £50pm for the selections themselves and £25pm for the software. This is the method I used. There were a number of discrepancies with regards to Option 3 selections and Option 2 selections which were pointed out by subscribers to the system. All I can say is that I know how the software works and Roger would have had to put the selections up for end customers to get them, so they were correct for Option 3, there were quite a few selections that were bet on twice again this can be caused by errors from the author in the daily programming of the bot itself, it’s easy to do, I have done it myself accidentally.
After your third months subscription you will be sent a copy of the manual (Option 1) free of charge.
Sportworld are offering your 1st month at half price at the moment- £37.50 1st month only, cancel at any time.
This method is the best one for people who do not want to, or do not want to spend all day at their PC.
I don’t feel at home in giving my full backing to this system; its return on investment is very low indeed, caused mainly by the poor performance of the Back bets. I cannot say it hasn’t worked either +97pts in 3 months is a good return, which is refreshing for a Sportsworld product. However the monthly fees of Option 1 (£50pm) and Option 3 (£75) are somewhat prohibitive to people with minimal betting banks.
I would recommend anyone following this system have a bank of at least £500 and use a 200pt level stake, so the net profit for each option would be as follows:
£2.50 times 97.22 = £243.05 gross profit
Subscription fee = £195.
Nett profit after 3 months = £48.05
£2.50 times 97.22 = £243.05 gross profit
Subscription fee = £150.
Nett profit after 3 months = £93.05
£2.50 times 97.22 = £243.05 gross profit
Subscription fee = £225.
Nett profit after 3 months = £18.05
So as you can see from the above, you do not get much return for your total investment from using a safe staking method. So I give this system a NEUTRAL review, it works, but higher strike rates and better performances from the Back selections are required.
[Click here to see Follow The Fortunes...]
Rating:
Kind Regards
Ian Morris
Filed under Betting System Reviews by on Jul 16th, 2010.
One Good Bet Review Summary
Rating:
Hi Bloggers
Rather than dress up this review summary, let’s just say this has to be one of the all
time flops in my time reviewing systems over the last two years.
53 days produced just 19 bets of which NONE were winning doubles and only eight
involved place wins. However as most of these place doubles included unplaced runners,
the returns were often less than the stake!
The system is far too woolly and open to subjectivity. For example the ebook gives
various Racing Post data to analyse to arrive at the selections but finishes by saying:
“The final decision has to have a certain amount of personal judgement factored into it”
So, basically if you are not sure if your selections are the best available just go with your
gut instinct! I certainly don’t consider paying £95 to represent good value just to end
up having to use my own judgement!!
Another interesting development is that Sportsworld Publishing have pulled the sales
page so even if you are foolish enough to want to invest in the system, you can’t do so
now anyway.
(I also noticed Lay It Safe has been pulled by Sportsworld as well. Must be the power of
Betting System Truths in exposing these nonsense services!)
As one of our readers commented on this review earlier, Maybe the title “One Good Bet”
means one good bet in the Flat season!! Unfortunately, after two months – almost half
way through the season – we are still waiting for it to happen.
Without hesitation, I recommend One Good Bet is FAILED and JAILED
indefinitely.
52 days / 19 bets with cumulative P/L - 12.47 points
[Click Here To See That One Good Bet Has Been Removed From Sportsworld Publishing!]
Cheers
Sgt Jon
Rating:
Filed under Passed and Recommended by on Jul 2nd, 2010.
Neutral Pending Further Review
Rating: 
[Click here for Footballing prophets...]
Hi Bloggers,
Unfortunately the review has to be shelved until the start of next season. We will pick up from where we left off at that time. Martin had stated previously that Footballing Prophets may send selections out for Australian soccer matches in the closed UK season.
Footballing Prophets have not decided to go ahead with that idea and have chosen to continue to test their theories which will hopefully result in Australian selections being sent out at the end of next season.
I have therefore decided to suspend the review with the label of Neutral pending further trial. The service has been reviewed for 69 days since 8th March 2010. It is not able to satisfy the full trial period of 84 days. So even though the results have not lived up to expectations, it would not be proper to fail it at this stage without giving it the full attention it deserves.
[Click here for Footballing prophets...]
Cheers
Ian Morris
Filed under Betting System Reviews by on May 18th, 2010.
UK Horseracing TV Review Summary
Rating:
Hi Bloggers,
Unfortunately due to some persistant internet problems, I have had to wrap
up the review earlier than anticipated. I can however still give an informed opinion
on the last several weeks of using the service.
First of all on the manual trading side of things, I managed around 50 days trying
this service out as recommended by Sid, the author, as the optimum way to trade
on these selections. As you know my overall flat stake profit got up to + 80 odd pts
in that time and although I’m not sure what that total may have reached by 84 days,
I am pretty confident it would have been over the 100 pt mark at least.
I may have been a little lucky during that time in that I managed to finish my
trading quite early on many occasions, but there were times where I had to trade
for 3 or 4 hours to get the required daily profit. This factor has to be taken into
account when weighing up the time spent versus profit gained factor, and the
question, is the monthly charge plus the time spent gaining a profit acceptable
when considering the total profit made? This is definitely a matter of personal
preference, circumstance and having the ability and, to some degree, the skill
necessary to manually trade successfully. There is definitely some potential there
IF you have the time and patience to try it.
On the point of Auto trading.
Firstly I don’t really have enough evidence to support this type of trading, despite
the fantastic feedback from the bloggers with some of their detailed summaries, etc.
The couple of days I did try this myself with various settings resulted in some
heavy losses, albeit I was auto trading with no stop losses in place just for the
purposes of the trial. The evidence from the bloggers though would seem to support
the lack of any real cohesive settings on the software with many up and down days
over the course of the last several weeks.
Sid has not really produced a ‘blueprint’ for optimum Auto trading but I’m sure
this is something he is striving towards ‘getting a handle on’ in the coming weeks
and months. I certainly hope he succeeds.
Sid himself provides an excellent customer service and unlike certain other
‘parties’ around here, actually does reply promptly to any and all queries you
may have and is more than happy to help with problems with the software, excel
settings, etc. I certainly have no complaints on that score.
So in conclusion and in agreement with James, we have decided to put UK
Horseracing TV into the neutral section for the moment, with a possible view for
re-consideration, when the settings (auto trading) look to start showing a more
consistent return on a daily and weekly basis.
I would like to thank Sid, James (not Sid James!) and all the contributors to the blog
for their fantastic feedback over the last several weeks. I have really enjoyed
reviewing this particular service and look forward to hearing more from UK
Horseracing TV soon.
All the best, Tommy.
[Click Here To See Uk Horse Racing.TV....]
Rating:
Filed under Betting System Reviews by on May 12th, 2010.
Betting Pros – Final Review
Rating:
The review of Betting Pros lasted for 84 days. I took over from James on the 31st January. In this period we had just 39 betting days, and only 63 selections. This kind of service is very hard to gauge in the fact that it does deliver what it says on its site. The overall cost works out at around 4 to 5 pounds a month depending when you would have joined.
My concern here is the low ROI (return on investment) It worked out at 6.35% during the trial. If you had deducted the 40 pounds membership fee which would take you up to end of August 2010 the ROI would drop to 5.90%.
This service is really for the larger backer to make sums like 567.50 pounds profit. To make this figure you would have had to lay out 8930 pounds in total, having said that if you had started with a 1000 pound bank the lowest it ever dropped to was 835.44 pounds and you would have made the 567.50 pounds profit also.
I suppose it would be possible to start off with a bank of 500 pounds and you would have made 283.75 but of course the subscription even though low cost would affect this more and take your ROI down to 5.46%.
The service concentrates on football with the occasional other sporting bet and is backing to win, the price of selections is short and the average bet works out at 1.28.
Out of the 63 selections 52 of them won, the longest losing run was only 1 and this of course happened 11 times. The longest winning run was 18.
Of the 11 losers four were 150 point bets; all the 200 and 250 points bets won, but if any of these had lost it really would have knocked the service back.
E-mails were sent out the night before and the website is always updated regularly. In regards o the Quality of service, it is professionally run, absolutely no complaints there.
I am going to place this in neutral and award it 2.5 stars, I cannot fail it because as I said it delivers exactly what it claims. It is a professionally run service, but who is this really going to appeal to? It’s a very specific market…
The backer here would have to be placing at times 250 pound and 200 pound bets. The service actually recommends a 2000 pound bank so you could double those amounts. So if you like very short runs and you can mentally and financially handle larger stakes on short odds then this service could be for you. Maybe one could review this service again in September and see what the new membership subscription costs would be and see if there are any new additional parts to the service.
Regards
Sgt Dave
Rating:
Filed under Betting System Reviews by on Apr 24th, 2010.
SPORTS POWER TIPS – FINAL REVIEW
Rating:
Hi Bloggers
Here is my final review of Sports Power Tips which I took over from The Commissioner on Day 18. After much consideration and looking at the overall ROI for the review period, I decided to award it 3 stars and a neutral recommendation.
It is a good sports service but did not quite deliver “in my opinion” to its true potential during the review. You get e-mail everyday and if by chance this does not come through, you have a membership webpage where you can get the selections from.
My e-mails to Shaun and Steve were answered fairly quickly and politely so no problems there.
If I take the results of the 84 days in the first 4 weeks it lost a total of 32.13 points. During this time we had our longest losing run which was 6 and to which you would have lost 41.82 points, in this period we also had our longest winning run which was also 6 and produced 28.25 points profit. This kind of illustrates the problem, SPT will make money, but you will have to suffer a roller coaster ride with some good highs and bad lows.
On to weeks 5 to 8 the service made a profit of 23.54 points but in the running total you still would have been at minus 8.59 points.
Eventually in weeks 9 to 12 we hit the jackpot making 69.91 points in that period and our cumulative total for the review ended at 61.32 points. It should be noted that we made 30.50 points profit in the last 3 days of the review.
Here is the breakdown of the review period. Note that Number of Winners includes selections that were each way and were placed as well as just straight out winners.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.
Now a 6.36% return on investment is still a profit but not that great really and the monthly subscription is a penny short of 50 pounds so for our review you would have spent 149.97 pounds on the Membership Fee so if using 5 pound per point you would have cleared 156.63 and you would have staked 4821.25 pounds to get it which
is only around 3.25% ROI. So to be safe here I would suggest that a 100 point bank be in order, so order to get anything out of this you would need to start off with at least a minimum of 1000 pounds betting bank with 10 pounds per point. The most points lost in a day was 14.44 and the most won was 26.22 so once again the high and lows are quite high.
Two other concerns are that at times it was difficult to get some of the prices that Shaun was getting especially on back bets and the second the Lay Bets on the results page do not have any Betfair commission deducted from them.
To be fair to the service it did actually under perform during the trial, now I am not comparing it with August and September 2009 they were really exceptional months profit wise, but with October, November and December 2009, let’s have a look:
|
|
Sports Power Tips Oct, Nov and Dec2009 |
|||
|
|
Oct |
Nov |
Dec |
Total |
|
No of Selections |
167 |
138 |
90 |
395 |
|
No of Winners |
63 |
58 |
45 |
166 |
|
Strike rate |
37.74% |
42% |
50% |
42% |
|
Total Amount Staked |
315.50pts |
294.25 pts |
249 pts |
858.75 pts |
|
Profit |
64.6pts |
13.9pts |
50.25pts |
128.81pts |
|
Return on Investment |
20% |
4.72% |
20.18% |
15% |
Now it must be noted that there was no commission taken off the lay bets for these 3 months unlike during my review so there was a further 1.75 pts to be deducted for the winning lay bets so our total profit is 127.06 points giving you an actual ROI of 14.8% which is a lot better than the 6.36% on our review and without the whopping ROI’S and profits of August and September being added. So as we can see SPT does have a lot potential, of course with the summer months approaching there will be bets on different sports.
In conclusion if you have a reasonable betting bank behind you, can handle the occasional heavy losses to gain some good wins, like to bet on a variety of sports then SPT could be for you.
Rating:
Regards
[Click Here For Sports Power Tips Website...]
Sgt Dave
Filed under Betting System Reviews by on Apr 16th, 2010.
Football Betting Tipsters – Click to see
19th March 2010 – End of Review - Rating:
Coca-Cola League Championship
Newcastle United (at home to scunthorpe) Wednesday 17th March
Best Price: 1/3 (1.33 )
Recommended Bet: 150 points on Newcastle to Win. – WON +47.03 Points
Total for period = +47.03 Points
Cumulative P/L = +61.11 Points
Now this may seem like a lot of points profit for a 56 day time span but let me enlighten you a little.
We spent 2800 points to make 61 points profit. The average amount of your bank staked was 215 points per bet. This is very very high risk wagering.
I reported results using Betfair Prices so that means that i should show what average bets you will be making to make each profit.
For example we placed £2800 worth of bets in 56 days to make £61 profit? Seem reasonable? hardly!
The average bet made was £215 at averager odds of 1.2, making on average £43 profit if that bet won and losing £215 if it lost.
Purely on this basis of the high risks involvd with this service. It has failed a 56 day review.
Rating:
Betting system Guru
Filed under Betting System Reviews by on Mar 21st, 2010.
The Dutching Diamond Review Summary
Final Review Summary - Rating:
Although the Dutching Diamond has had a fantastic run and been
hyped up by another “rival” website, which had the audacity to use
my review even though it wasn’t complete, I still have doubts
about this system.
If we go back to basics, you will recall that we are backing
3 horses in every race, even down to a 5 horse race, in the hope
that one of them will win and produce a £10 profit each time.
My understanding of “dutching” is that you are normally backing
2 horses in a race not 3.
The only problem with this type of betting system is that the
normal stakes can be around £20 to £40 for a £10 return, which can
result in total wipeout if we hit a losing run. (The longest losing
run thus far has been one race)
The system itself is based on historical racing logic and results,
which do make sense and seem to come up with results on a regular basis.
Personally I find the checking process to establish the selections too
cumbersome and have always used the author’s low rate telephone
line, which gives the selections by 10am most days. In this way there
can be no doubt that the selections are correct.
If you want to go down the route of picking your own bets, you will
need a paid subscription to the racing post. The system can also be used
for Irish racing which is another plus factor.
The cost of the system is £99 which is not too onerous bearing in mind the
results achieved during the last 56 days.
Now I don’t want to “ditch” the dutching diamond, but I am not comfortable recommending a
system which has such a high risk factor. It may be that another review can be
undertaken in the future, but at the moment my own opinion is that this system
should be consigned to the Neutral Section (and I hope James agrees with me).
I will leave it up to you if you want to pay £99 and try out the selections for
yourself.
Days 53-56 Profit Total + 60 points
Using a profit margin of 15% and over, profit 462.61 pts profit. (Bank 1462.61 from a starting 1000 pts)
Rating: – [You can see The Dutching Diamond here...]
Philip
Filed under Betting System Reviews by on Mar 19th, 2010.