Greyhound Tipster Final Review
Rating: 
Hi Bloggers,
So the end of the 56 day trial and unfortunately I have to give the big red sign
above to Greyhound Tipster.
We ended the trial with figures of – 48.60 pts for the system as a whole which
includes the GHT, GHTB and GHTL selections combined. The fact that the GHTB
and GHTL selections mysteriously disappeared a few weeks back tells me that
the greyhound boys were in somewhat of a quandary as to how to proceed with
the service and I received no real explanation as to the why’s and wherefore’s
for this particular decision. In fact over the trial I received practically no feedback
from the authors on what they were doing. A definite minus point there to
go with the minus figures. The only plus was the fact that when the GHTB selections
stopped, they were in fact at + 15 odd pts, so maybe this could be the way to go
for future versions of the system. Unfortunately I am only reviewing the system
as a whole and not individual parts, so as a whole it just didn’t ‘cut the mustard’
as they say.
Keep trying guys and see what you can come up with for our little 4 legged friends!
Rating:
All the best, Tommy.
Filed under Betting System Reviews by on Apr 14th, 2010. 
Losing to Profit – Final Review
Hi Bloggers
Here is my Final Review for Losing to Profit and i have decided for the time being to place this in neutral and award 3 stars the reasons for this are stated below. This service has been a bit of enigma in the first two weeks of the trial it was 20 points down and looking a no hoper and by the 90th day it was 21.29 points up in theory you could say that it should have passed but around the 52nd day of the review the system operator done some tweaking of the method and since then its had 29 Winning Lays on the trot. Also the average price of the losing lays only worked out at 4.64 BFSP and the ROI is 23.65% now compare that with the previous years based on the LTP website figures:
2004 - 7.31 , ROI 15.52% , 2005 – 7.02 , ROI 12.53 , 2006 - 7.45 , ROI 13.86%, 2007 – 7.53 , ROI 19.03%, 2008 – 6.99 BFSP, ROI 9.89%, 2009 – 6.98 BFSP, ROI 8.48%
Note that 2009 only goes upto November 25th and of course there was no BFSP before 2008 but as you can see our review BFSP is alot less than previous years now is this a pure fluke? and the ROI is over 4.5% higher than the best year 2007 now if this is a result of the extra tweaks then we could have a makings of a real profitable service here but i have only had 38 days of the improved selections so i cannot make a concrete judgement based on that period. The operator of the service is most helpful and will send me his selections for a bit longer yet, this will at least give me a better idea so hopefully i can add an update to this review. Also i noticed that the number of selections had dropped with the improvements it could just be the time of year or the effect of the tweaks. I did notice that the LTP website results had not been updated since October 2009 and on all Results it only went upto November 25th 2009, i have been informed by the operator that he will be updating all the results and making some changes to the site. Currently e-mails are sent out at 11am or there abouts and a follow up e-mail is sent out around 15 minutes before racetime which is not that convenient, as i understand e-mails will be sent out the night before racing now. The operator is also looking at maybe getting software developed to allow the method to be used on a bot, this will obviously depend on the number of subscribers he has as to whether it would be a viable proposition. I think bloggers you can now see why i have put this into the neutral i hope to be able to add an extra piece to this report in around 4 weeks.
As far as i know the maximum price of the lay will still be 14.5 BFSP this kind of lay price may not be for everyone, thankfully winners at this price do not happen very often but we did get hit by a 13.79 winner in the first 15 days of the trial and it does take some clawing back. Looking at previous results this service could be abit of a roller coaster ride i see a couple of months with over 30 points losses and then winning months with several 30 plus point gains including a 51.75 point one but it does make a profit overall now whether the changes made in February will smooth out the extreme high and lows we will have to see. Anyway here are the stats for the review period:
Selections 90, Winning Lays 76 = 86.65% Strike Rate, Profit 21.29 points to 1 point stakes, Return on Investment 23.65%, Average Price of Loser 4.64 BFSP.
The longest losing run was 2 and the longest winning run 29 during the review, this would give credibility to the websites claims of losing runs no longer than 3, and winning runs of over 30 plus fifteen times.
In conclusion we have a service that costs 37 pounds a month (Cheaper on yearly subscription), an operator that is helpful and answers e-mail promptly and potentially a very good lay service if the tweaked method maintains anything like its present form. If the website is updated as promised, e-mails are sent out the night before and a bot could be developed to run the selections that would be useful too. Just to add that since the 90th Day trial ended on the 25th March upto April 7th there has only been 4 lays and all were winning ones for the service, now of course we are now crossing over to the flat season proper so that could be the reason for so few selections, i will continue to monitor for another 4 weeks at least and give an update here.
Rating:
[Check Out Losing To Profit Here...]
Regards
Sgt Dave
Filed under Betting System Reviews by on Apr 9th, 2010.
Well I am not sure what to say on this one, which is unusual for me!
I think that this review summary needs to be short and sweet.
Basically this service is an unmitigated disaster and should be jailed immediately.
A dismal failure for “value” and I for one will not be subscribing.
I am not sure if we have managed to lose the entire betting bank before, but we have now!
The results were recorded on a daily basis and show an overall loss of – £51.72 for days 20 -27 , which now means that our original bank of £100 is at a measly £0.40!!
From £100 to £0.40 in 27 days says it all.
Rating: 
Over and out!
Sgt Philip
Filed under Betting System Reviews by on Apr 8th, 2010.
BETFAIR MIRACLE – FINAL REVIEW
Hi Bloggers
Well before I start it is unlikely that I would ever give 5 stars to any system or service as far as I am concerned there is no such thing as a perfect system or service this is my own personal opinion and I would be happy if one day I was proved to be wrong but somehow I doubt it. But I believe there is some very good systems or services but you just have to really search for it and I believe this is one of them.
How do I rate Betfair Miracle simply put four stars out of five, why because it delivers what it says on the tin and that is why I recommend it. Will it make you a instant fortune No, will it make you steady profits without giving you high blood Yes, is it short term No , is it long term Yes. Now the regular blogger’s should know me by now I will obviously be backing this up with some facts and figures, also I want to say that the author provided good customer service and only one e-mail went a stray during the 90 day trial this was due to a main computer problem. Not that you actually need the e-mail but it is provided free for the 21 days once you buy the system along with spreadsheets.
Right on to the results for the whole of the trial which remember does not include Sunday betting for both Main and Bonus Selections we had the following: (Note all profits quoted are to 1 point level stakes and Betfair commission of 5% is deducted)
Selections 63, Winning Lays 58 = Strike Rate 92.06 %, Profit 29.17 points,
Return on Investment 46.30%, Average Price of Losing Lay (BFSP) 6.24
So was this a flash in the pan, lets look at the results from June 7th 2007 to the day before the review started December 28th 2009, now although past results cannot guarantee the future results at least we can see if there is consistency:
Selections 652, Winning Lays 594 = Strike Rate 91.07%, Profit 301.41 points,
Return on Investment 46.38%, Average Price of Losing Lay (BFSP) 5.51
As you can see there no really dramatic differences except for the average losing lay price is abit higher this to me indicates a stable system, the longest losing run since June 2007 has been 3 and this has happened twice so far, with 2 consecutive losers eight times. As for winning runs it has 9 with over 20 consecutive winning lays including a 59, 41 and a 40. During the review the longest losing run was 1 and the longest winning run 26.
Actually there is a several occasions when the Bonus selection is the same as the Main Selection and we could class these as Bankers they have the best strike rate and the best ROI and actually puts the normal Bonus only selections in its place as the worse performer. For this one I have enclosed the results from June 2007 to the end of the trial:
Banker Selections: 141, Winning Lays 133 = Strike Rate 94.3%, Profit 94.30 points
Return on Investment 66.90%, Average Price of Losing Lay 5.00 (BFSP).
Normal Bonus Selections 124, Winning Lays 108 = S/R 87.1%, Profit 20.84 points,
Return on Investment 16.80%, Average Price of Losing Lays 6.11 (BFSP).
Clearly which ever way you go with this system you should make steady consistent profits but I like to wring out every last percentage of a system and my adaptation of this method would be to back only the Main and Banker Selections this would also be an ideal approach for fixed liability staking say 5 or 10% of the Bank with short losing runs, long winning runs and a slightly reduced BFSP odds on your losing lays as shown below.
Main/Banker Selections: 591, Winning Lays 544 = Strike Rate 92.08%,
Profits 310.74 points, ROI 52.57%, Average Price of Losing Lay 5.39
Conclusion
Whether you decide to back all the selections which when taking in all results from June 2007 to-date would give you an average profit of 9.75 points per month with around 21 selections average for a month, or the Main/Banker ones which produced just over 17 selections a month with an average of 9.14 points the system appears to be solid. Now there has been some debate in the past about the author quoting profits to ISP and not to BFSP and not deducting Betfair commission unfortunately he is not the only one who does this, although it was pain and it took many hours for me to convert the figures it still does not distract from the fact that BFM is a good system. Although it is hard to give 100% accurate figures I have calculated that there is around 11.1 % difference between BFSP and ISP, so when you add the 5% deduction for BF commission you end with deducting 16.1% from the profits shown at ISP. If it was a case that the ISP prices was necessary to keep the system in profit then I would have had serious doubts but as can be seen from previous quoted figures in this review which were to BFSP and commission deducted, they are very respectable.
I have seen on another site that they questioned about BFM betting on a Sunday and that the results for the system must have been bad so they did not include them, the answer lies in the fact that on Sundays there is limited information on each race on the RP website and this system uses the RP Basic membership, it is unwise to bet if you do not have all the info. For those who work during the day you can use a Bot to place the selections, if you do not you will have to check the Bookies odds just before the off to see whether the selection is a bet or not then lay with Betfair. So apart from having to be around near the time of a selections race or use a Bot the only other downside is subscribing to the Racing Post basic membership but there are a lot of systems using this so it just breaks down the cost if you add this one. The system the last time I looked a couple of days ago is available at 67 pounds which I think this is good value as the system seems to have sensible rules which should be relevant for quite a while, would I use BFM yes I fully intend to add this to a small but select portfolio of mine
Rating: 
Passed and Recommended!
Regards
Sgt Dave
[Click Here to Purchase The Betfair Miracle....]
Filed under Betting System Reviews, Passed and Recommended by on Apr 7th, 2010.
Football Betting Tipsters – Click to see
19th March 2010 – End of Review - Rating:
Coca-Cola League Championship
Newcastle United (at home to scunthorpe) Wednesday 17th March
Best Price: 1/3 (1.33 )
Recommended Bet: 150 points on Newcastle to Win. – WON +47.03 Points
Total for period = +47.03 Points
Cumulative P/L = +61.11 Points
Now this may seem like a lot of points profit for a 56 day time span but let me enlighten you a little.
We spent 2800 points to make 61 points profit. The average amount of your bank staked was 215 points per bet. This is very very high risk wagering.
I reported results using Betfair Prices so that means that i should show what average bets you will be making to make each profit.
For example we placed £2800 worth of bets in 56 days to make £61 profit? Seem reasonable? hardly!
The average bet made was £215 at averager odds of 1.2, making on average £43 profit if that bet won and losing £215 if it lost.
Purely on this basis of the high risks involvd with this service. It has failed a 56 day review.
Rating:
Betting system Guru
Filed under Betting System Reviews by on Mar 21st, 2010.
The Dutching Diamond Review Summary
Final Review Summary - Rating:
Although the Dutching Diamond has had a fantastic run and been
hyped up by another “rival” website, which had the audacity to use
my review even though it wasn’t complete, I still have doubts
about this system.
If we go back to basics, you will recall that we are backing
3 horses in every race, even down to a 5 horse race, in the hope
that one of them will win and produce a £10 profit each time.
My understanding of “dutching” is that you are normally backing
2 horses in a race not 3.
The only problem with this type of betting system is that the
normal stakes can be around £20 to £40 for a £10 return, which can
result in total wipeout if we hit a losing run. (The longest losing
run thus far has been one race)
The system itself is based on historical racing logic and results,
which do make sense and seem to come up with results on a regular basis.
Personally I find the checking process to establish the selections too
cumbersome and have always used the author’s low rate telephone
line, which gives the selections by 10am most days. In this way there
can be no doubt that the selections are correct.
If you want to go down the route of picking your own bets, you will
need a paid subscription to the racing post. The system can also be used
for Irish racing which is another plus factor.
The cost of the system is £99 which is not too onerous bearing in mind the
results achieved during the last 56 days.
Now I don’t want to “ditch” the dutching diamond, but I am not comfortable recommending a
system which has such a high risk factor. It may be that another review can be
undertaken in the future, but at the moment my own opinion is that this system
should be consigned to the Neutral Section (and I hope James agrees with me).
I will leave it up to you if you want to pay £99 and try out the selections for
yourself.
Days 53-56 Profit Total + 60 points
Using a profit margin of 15% and over, profit 462.61 pts profit. (Bank 1462.61 from a starting 1000 pts)
Rating: – [You can see The Dutching Diamond here...]
Philip
Filed under Betting System Reviews by on Mar 19th, 2010.
Welcome to my review website, Betting System Review.
This is the sister site of Betting System Truths.
The detailed testing takes place at Betting System Truths.
Betting System Review the site you are on now will give you the cleaned down version of that site and list what we think about all systems and services that are reviewed.
At the end of a 56 – 84 day review we categorise the product and at that point it will be listed on this site you are seeing now Betting System Review.
On this site you will see ratings out of 5
Here is an example of the ratings 1/5 – 5/5
Rating: Rating: Rating: Rating: Rating: Rating: Rating: Rating: Rating:
All the very best,
James Fitzmaurice
Filed under Introduction by on Mar 19th, 2010. 1 Comment.