Rating: 
Hi Bloggers
Psychic Racing Review Summary, May 17 2010
Well after 56 days and a very bumpy downward spiral, we finish with a bank of £541.79 from our initial £1000.00, giving us a loss of £458.21. The system did get off to a bad start and unfortunately never recovered. Although there has been some improvement over the last couple of weeks, it is unlikely that the system will make a profit in 84 days, therefore the review has ended now.
Not a lot more I can say about this, that has not been said on the blog before.
Putting it simply Psychic Racing has failed the trial, and it’s over to the Commissioner to do the jailing!
Sgt Philip
Filed under Betting System Reviews by on May 18th, 2010. 
UK Horseracing TV Review Summary
Rating: 
Hi Bloggers,
Unfortunately due to some persistant internet problems, I have had to wrap
up the review earlier than anticipated. I can however still give an informed opinion
on the last several weeks of using the service.
First of all on the manual trading side of things, I managed around 50 days trying
this service out as recommended by Sid, the author, as the optimum way to trade
on these selections. As you know my overall flat stake profit got up to + 80 odd pts
in that time and although I’m not sure what that total may have reached by 84 days,
I am pretty confident it would have been over the 100 pt mark at least.
I may have been a little lucky during that time in that I managed to finish my
trading quite early on many occasions, but there were times where I had to trade
for 3 or 4 hours to get the required daily profit. This factor has to be taken into
account when weighing up the time spent versus profit gained factor, and the
question, is the monthly charge plus the time spent gaining a profit acceptable
when considering the total profit made? This is definitely a matter of personal
preference, circumstance and having the ability and, to some degree, the skill
necessary to manually trade successfully. There is definitely some potential there
IF you have the time and patience to try it.
On the point of Auto trading.
Firstly I don’t really have enough evidence to support this type of trading, despite
the fantastic feedback from the bloggers with some of their detailed summaries, etc.
The couple of days I did try this myself with various settings resulted in some
heavy losses, albeit I was auto trading with no stop losses in place just for the
purposes of the trial. The evidence from the bloggers though would seem to support
the lack of any real cohesive settings on the software with many up and down days
over the course of the last several weeks.
Sid has not really produced a ‘blueprint’ for optimum Auto trading but I’m sure
this is something he is striving towards ‘getting a handle on’ in the coming weeks
and months. I certainly hope he succeeds.
Sid himself provides an excellent customer service and unlike certain other
‘parties’ around here, actually does reply promptly to any and all queries you
may have and is more than happy to help with problems with the software, excel
settings, etc. I certainly have no complaints on that score.
So in conclusion and in agreement with James, we have decided to put UK
Horseracing TV into the neutral section for the moment, with a possible view for
re-consideration, when the settings (auto trading) look to start showing a more
consistent return on a daily and weekly basis.
I would like to thank Sid, James (not Sid James!) and all the contributors to the blog
for their fantastic feedback over the last several weeks. I have really enjoyed
reviewing this particular service and look forward to hearing more from UK
Horseracing TV soon.
All the best, Tommy.
[Click Here To See Uk Horse Racing.TV....]
Rating:
Filed under Betting System Reviews by on May 12th, 2010.
Rating:
The Easy Back Method Review Summary
Hi Bloggers
I delayed writing up my review summary for a week as I wanted to monitor a further
week in the hope that results would turn around and that I would at least have been
able to recommend that the system be released on bail.
I have to confess to liking this system which reminds me so much of The Commissioner’s
own “Life System” where you are often backing unfancied horses based on the Racing
Post forecast SPs.
Unfortunately, the bad run of results continued for the additional week and a further
loss of 33 points would have been sustained if backing to level stakes and a further loss
of 4 points if using my suggested Stop At Profit/Loss plan.
The system uses logical reasoning to try and identify likely winning bets that are
undervalued primarily in the PLACE market, thereby producing long priced winners
although the system author does provide additional filters to reduce the number
of daily selections although this involves quite detailed research using Racing Post
Data and you would have to be a RP subscriber to carry out the necessary daily analysis.
However, I found the additional filters a bit cumbersome and time consuming and
really, if you want to adopt that aproach, I recommend signing up for the selection
service at £25 per month at The Betting School.
Membership will also give you other system selections as well as access to The Betting
School newsletter and various articles.
If following all selections, the main drawback is the sheer numbers of daily selections
( can be as many as 20+ each day) and long losing runs. Selections are easy enough to
find from the Racing Post and normally take around 20 minutes each day. The review
backed all selections in the Betfair Place Market as this is the approach recommended
in the e-book as being the most profitable.
The Stop At Profit of 1 net point or loss of 5 points each day was monitored for the last
five weeks as an attempt to reduce the impact of long losing runs and whilst results do
support this approach, the system still made an unacceptable loss during the trial (which
ran for 90 days). At best, I can only recommend the system for fun bets using minimum
stakes and a bank of at least 50 points that you are prepared to lose.
Based on the results achieved during the trial, I have little choice other
than recommending The Easy Back Method is placed in the FAILED category.
90 days cumulative P/L backing all selections was - 53.87 points
35 days cumulative P/L using Stop at Profit/Loss was – 9.42 points
[ Click Here To See The Easy Back Method....]
Rating:
Cheers
Sgt Jon
Filed under Betting System Reviews by on May 4th, 2010.
Lay The Ratings
[Click Here To See Lay The Ratings...]
Rating: 
This is my final review of Lay The Ratings.
I want to start by saying that I have Passed Lay The Ratings and It becomes 1 in only 3 systems/services to make the grade at the moment. As you know we regularly update our categories so that there is never stale information on the blog.
Our trial started on the 24th January this year and has now ended on the 24th April which means out test lasted 90 whole betting days.
We received 430 selections by email and from those we had 355 winning selections. So the strike rate was 82.56% overall for the trial.
The average price that we layed at in the trial was 6.59 BFSP (Betfair SP) based on 430 selections. This in my opinion comes under the category of a safe laying formula.
The Return on Investment when calculated to your total outlay is not actually that bad, but I am not doing cartwheels at 11% . Do not let this obscure the final outcome though as this does not tell the full story. Although the ROI is 11% for total outlay this is just a figure touted in comparison to how much outlay you have had over the 3 months and I would have to say that this figure on this occasion is not that important.
The True ROI is what sort of bank size would have been needed to Truly make the decent money and I can say with a bank of £100 you would be now sitting on £143.56 this is a True Return on initial investment of 43.56%, do this 4 times a year to total 12 months and you are not doing to badly at all. The average punter that lays uses between a 500 – 1000 starting capital in my experience and the money you can make is detailed below for the various starting capitals.
£100 = £143.56
£300 = £430.68
£500 = £717.80
£1000 = £1,435.60
£2000 = £2,871.20
£5000 = £7,178
£10000 = £14,356
The author has asked if he can keep proofing his selections to me for the foreseeable future as it helps him to keep good track on his results and in doing so I will continue to keep a close eye on Lay the Ratings and further analysis will of course follow as it does with all passed systems/services.
Lay The Ratings gets the Big Thumbs up and I recommend it to blog readers
[Click Here To See Lay The Ratings...]
Rating:
Filed under Passed and Recommended by on Apr 24th, 2010.
Betting Pros – Final Review
Rating:
The review of Betting Pros lasted for 84 days. I took over from James on the 31st January. In this period we had just 39 betting days, and only 63 selections. This kind of service is very hard to gauge in the fact that it does deliver what it says on its site. The overall cost works out at around 4 to 5 pounds a month depending when you would have joined.
My concern here is the low ROI (return on investment) It worked out at 6.35% during the trial. If you had deducted the 40 pounds membership fee which would take you up to end of August 2010 the ROI would drop to 5.90%.
This service is really for the larger backer to make sums like 567.50 pounds profit. To make this figure you would have had to lay out 8930 pounds in total, having said that if you had started with a 1000 pound bank the lowest it ever dropped to was 835.44 pounds and you would have made the 567.50 pounds profit also.
I suppose it would be possible to start off with a bank of 500 pounds and you would have made 283.75 but of course the subscription even though low cost would affect this more and take your ROI down to 5.46%.
The service concentrates on football with the occasional other sporting bet and is backing to win, the price of selections is short and the average bet works out at 1.28.
Out of the 63 selections 52 of them won, the longest losing run was only 1 and this of course happened 11 times. The longest winning run was 18.
Of the 11 losers four were 150 point bets; all the 200 and 250 points bets won, but if any of these had lost it really would have knocked the service back.
E-mails were sent out the night before and the website is always updated regularly. In regards o the Quality of service, it is professionally run, absolutely no complaints there.
I am going to place this in neutral and award it 2.5 stars, I cannot fail it because as I said it delivers exactly what it claims. It is a professionally run service, but who is this really going to appeal to? It’s a very specific market…
The backer here would have to be placing at times 250 pound and 200 pound bets. The service actually recommends a 2000 pound bank so you could double those amounts. So if you like very short runs and you can mentally and financially handle larger stakes on short odds then this service could be for you. Maybe one could review this service again in September and see what the new membership subscription costs would be and see if there are any new additional parts to the service.
Regards
Sgt Dave
Rating:
[Click here to see Betting Pros....]
Filed under Betting System Reviews by on Apr 24th, 2010.
Rating:
Wayne’s Roulette System Final Review
[Click Here To Open The 30 session Results Chart Video...]
Hi Guys, it’s finally that moment where I get to spill the beans on how ‘Wayne’s Roulette System’ performed over a thirty session review! Now, as I said in the introductory post, I have seen many, many roulette systems and I have found that there really is no ‘magic loophole’ that allows massive profits to be banked from online or offline roulette whether short term or long term, they all fall flat on their face sooner or later… that said, I did find Wayne’s Roulette System to be a different approach to all the others I’ve seen and whilst I wasn’t overly confident, I was impressed by seeing a new and different approach to making money from roulette!
So, I began by logging into the secure web page where you are able to access several videos of the author applying the strategy and a couple of tips and tricks for when the game isn’t going quite as well as it should – I joined several casinos online and tested the method over 30 separate sessions during which time I did employ a number of the ‘tips and tricks’ shown by the author in his videos. Now before I go into the results, I must state that I was somewhat surprised that when recording the videos which, according to the site are teaching you how to eventually be making $16,000 a day!!, the author stated the winning odds incorrectly on several occasions and in one of the videos where he is explaining what he believes is a fundemental ‘pattern’ in online roulette… he shows some calculations where the sum of two numbers is meant to be showing us how these patterns exist and yet…to my bemusement, the total shown is incorrect!!
Now, I played roulette for many years and whilst I certainly never made thousands of dollars every day, I did come to know all the odds on the table by heart so I find it strange that this guy who is claiming to make big bucks from roulette is – i.Selling his ’secret’ and ii. Doesn’t know the table odds by heart ???
Now to the hard facts of the review: When I first started with baited breath, I was surprised to find that from my first 5 sessions, I had only encountered one loss and was showing a profit of £136 and this was, I must admit, rather exciting so I fired on with the sessions each day hoping that this was how it was going to be…but alas I encountered the worst drawdown on the bank between sessions 8 and 12/13 where the bank had a drawdown at that time of over £320!! now if we look at the drawdown from the previous high of +£136 and the final lowest point..then we have a drawdown of -£436!!! This is sadly what I had suspected would happen right from the start.
I have to admit that from that point onwards, the system made a short but sweet recovery to +£15 before a few more losing sessions left us at -£127 so in the end we have spent a lot of time getting nowhere!
I have read the comments through and I will say now that the system is different to most and has an unusual method of covering a decent proportion of the table for minimal risk – I think that if you follow the system to the letter it will never make you thousands daily (unless we stick a minus sign in front of that :p ) BUT, if you are one of those people who can buy a system and then tweak it here & there….maybe, just maybe you will make the odd profit here and there but in the long run you can’t beat the maths of roulette and any loopholes (if they ever truly exist) are quickly ‘fixed’ by the very well paid security companies that monitor the sites’ software!
I found the author very helpful initially but after I asked a couple of ’sensitive’ questions with regard to whether he actually used the system regularly and made good profits, I never had another reply which doesn’t go down well in my book. I would have loved this to have been the ‘Holy Grail’ of roulette but sadly it is a ‘fake’ one and as such has been ‘caught red-handed’ – There is only one place for this system and that is behind bars! Verdict – Life Sentence!!
If you really want to see the system and try it for yourself then you are at least covered by Clickbank who will refund youre money up to 60 days from purchase! [Click Here To See Wayne's Roulette System...]
Sgt Paul Strawford
Rating:
Filed under Betting System Reviews by on Apr 22nd, 2010.
Rating: 
Hi Bloggers
After 56 days of reviewing 1000 Point System and despite a 34.44 BFSP winner (29.00 ISP) on the last day still showing losses of 68.32 points at BFSP and 79.13 at ISP i have to fail this and give it the minimum of 1.5 stars, in fact i could have ended it on Day 54 when the ISP losses were over 100 points and BFSP was at 94.11. I did observe Saturdays selections another 6 losers so it would now have been on a losing streak of 14 now, talking of losing streaks the longest was 35, followed by by a 23 and 2 lots of 11, as for winning runs the best it could manage was 3 lots of 2 hardly compensates for the losing spell does it?. You could say that the system was unlucky it had 57 selections placed 2nd or 3rd out of 176 races left after deducting the 26 winners, but at the end of the day the losing runs and losses are far to great for me to even consider extending a review to 84 days it has to be very close to breakeven or at least showing a small profit plus other factors. Well at 95 pounds for this system a very expensive price for what it has achieved nothing!, the truth is, it relies on the long shots at 50/1 or even higher on BFSP to make its profit but when it does not get these it is in big trouble and there is not enough steady shorter priced winners to hold it together. There is some logic behind the system but it needs more filters and a bit more research so that it can come up with lesser but stronger selections then just maybe it could be profitable. Here are some facts and figures for your perusal:
| Selections | 202 |
| Winners | 26 |
| Strike Rate | 12.87% |
| Longest Winning Run | 2 (3 times) |
| Longest Losing Run | 35 |
| P/L on ISP | minus 79.13 points |
| P/L on BFSP | minus 68.32 points |
Rating:
Regards
Sgt Dave
Filed under Betting System Reviews by on Apr 19th, 2010.
SCAM
Rating:
Please everyone beware of A J Tips.
I have evidence to prove that Andrew Jackson that operates A J Tips is not actually Andrew Jackson But Colin Andrews, He is the former keeper of the scam I revealed last week JCA Racing and Gold Lay.
Those two sites have now mysteriously disappeared and I strongly suggest everyone who paid them any money within the past 45 days contacts paypal for a refund saying the service has disappeared.
Ok so the evidence against A J Tips.
Firstly i received an email from AJ tips which was sent and addressed “Colin Andrews” This email contained aggresive language that i cannot show on the website as it may upset some viewers the language used is terrible.
The problem is the email was sent by Andrew Jacksons customer service email address. please see below. Obviously in their despair of being uncovered they have signed the email “Colin Andrews” as stupid as they are they hit sent and actually forgot which alias they were using. Absolutely pathetic! IT takes a very cool and collective person to lie to a mass amount of people and not leave any trails and these guys not only were poor at running tipping services they just do not cut the mustard at being scammers.
So you can see it was a pretty much a school boy error but you see you get caught out eventually. I believe Colin Andrews to be the same person behind the Jamie Kelly stuff. There is so much evidence pointing that way on the net.
Anyway the latest finds have been that i received several emails from people stating that they had asked for there refund in line with the guarantee offered on site [as per the below image] and no guarantee has been given there emails have simply been ignored, and in some cases as Jons below they were refused the refund. An easy one this via paypal, just point them to the guarantee…
Please see these comments also left on the blog…
SCAM
Rating:
[Click Here To Have Your Say!...]
Filed under Betting System Reviews by on Apr 19th, 2010.
SPORTS POWER TIPS – FINAL REVIEW
Rating:
Hi Bloggers
Here is my final review of Sports Power Tips which I took over from The Commissioner on Day 18. After much consideration and looking at the overall ROI for the review period, I decided to award it 3 stars and a neutral recommendation.
It is a good sports service but did not quite deliver “in my opinion” to its true potential during the review. You get e-mail everyday and if by chance this does not come through, you have a membership webpage where you can get the selections from.
My e-mails to Shaun and Steve were answered fairly quickly and politely so no problems there.
If I take the results of the 84 days in the first 4 weeks it lost a total of 32.13 points. During this time we had our longest losing run which was 6 and to which you would have lost 41.82 points, in this period we also had our longest winning run which was also 6 and produced 28.25 points profit. This kind of illustrates the problem, SPT will make money, but you will have to suffer a roller coaster ride with some good highs and bad lows.
On to weeks 5 to 8 the service made a profit of 23.54 points but in the running total you still would have been at minus 8.59 points.
Eventually in weeks 9 to 12 we hit the jackpot making 69.91 points in that period and our cumulative total for the review ended at 61.32 points. It should be noted that we made 30.50 points profit in the last 3 days of the review.
Here is the breakdown of the review period. Note that Number of Winners includes selections that were each way and were placed as well as just straight out winners.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.
Now a 6.36% return on investment is still a profit but not that great really and the monthly subscription is a penny short of 50 pounds so for our review you would have spent 149.97 pounds on the Membership Fee so if using 5 pound per point you would have cleared 156.63 and you would have staked 4821.25 pounds to get it which
is only around 3.25% ROI. So to be safe here I would suggest that a 100 point bank be in order, so order to get anything out of this you would need to start off with at least a minimum of 1000 pounds betting bank with 10 pounds per point. The most points lost in a day was 14.44 and the most won was 26.22 so once again the high and lows are quite high.
Two other concerns are that at times it was difficult to get some of the prices that Shaun was getting especially on back bets and the second the Lay Bets on the results page do not have any Betfair commission deducted from them.
To be fair to the service it did actually under perform during the trial, now I am not comparing it with August and September 2009 they were really exceptional months profit wise, but with October, November and December 2009, let’s have a look:
|
|
Sports Power Tips Oct, Nov and Dec2009 |
|||
|
|
Oct |
Nov |
Dec |
Total |
|
No of Selections |
167 |
138 |
90 |
395 |
|
No of Winners |
63 |
58 |
45 |
166 |
|
Strike rate |
37.74% |
42% |
50% |
42% |
|
Total Amount Staked |
315.50pts |
294.25 pts |
249 pts |
858.75 pts |
|
Profit |
64.6pts |
13.9pts |
50.25pts |
128.81pts |
|
Return on Investment |
20% |
4.72% |
20.18% |
15% |
Now it must be noted that there was no commission taken off the lay bets for these 3 months unlike during my review so there was a further 1.75 pts to be deducted for the winning lay bets so our total profit is 127.06 points giving you an actual ROI of 14.8% which is a lot better than the 6.36% on our review and without the whopping ROI’S and profits of August and September being added. So as we can see SPT does have a lot potential, of course with the summer months approaching there will be bets on different sports.
In conclusion if you have a reasonable betting bank behind you, can handle the occasional heavy losses to gain some good wins, like to bet on a variety of sports then SPT could be for you.
Rating:
Regards
[Click Here For Sports Power Tips Website...]
Sgt Dave
Filed under Betting System Reviews by on Apr 16th, 2010.
SCAM! Rating:
I feel today it is my duty to uncover what I have found during my diligence of JCA Racing And Gold Lay.
Here we have two people, one is Colin Andrews who spent nigh on 4 hours via Skype begging me not to do what I am doing right now. And Aiden Colin’s The owner of Gold Lay.
I was getting very suspicious at the times of day I was getting emails back from this pair which was one after the other so I decided to check the broadband providers they were sending me emails from and also the IP address, see image below.. (IP address determines the internet connection and computer being sent from)
Click Here to open up the image…
So as you can see from the image the emails from these two people were sent from the same IP address and also the computer! So who ever is running Gold Lay and JCA Racing they are one in the same person.
However upon contacting Colin he tried to tell me that He and Aiden are flat mates. This is just lies and deceit from the beginning.
I am today ending the reviews of JCA Racing and Gold Lay because I believe that you are all being lied to in the worst way possible. It is one thing creating an alias to protect your self from prying eyes on the internet and another to deceive punters. I think that what ever money you have tied up in these two services get it out fast.!
Further to this just recently Gold Lay has been having disastrous results I received emails from some very unhappy customers saying there whole banks were wiped out by gold lay, and now JCA racing from Colin has had a wipe out sequence and then straight after this there is no communication coming from either camp.
I believe both of these services to be a SCAM. And will be placed in the Scam section of betting system truths. I contacted Colin & Aiden to let him know what was happening about 20 minutes ago, and his reply is below..
======================================================
On 15 Apr 2010, at 13:06,
James Fitzmaurice wrote:
Colin you think I am going to give you extra time so that you can sell your website. I go public today…
Best Regards, James Fitzmaurice
======================================================
Colin’s Reply is below…
Dear James, I am selling the site… But I want extra time because I am exposing someone in the industry. I can reveal who Jamie Kelly is…. and you know him. I think its worth the wait.
Regards, Colin
======================================================
So There is this little war going on somewhere between “Jamie Kelly” who I think was behind the 5 star tipster that scammed hundreds of people and lost their complete banks and Colin Andrews if we can call him that. I just have no idea and I must say that there is so many alias in this industry and dishonesty I am completely stumped!
By all accounts on Sunday Colin will be emailing 53000 of his subscribers to let them know who Jamie Kelly really is, and I supposedly on the above evidence already know who he is…
I am guessing it is Iain Lewington as there has been some very shifty movement in the winning selections camp very recently with his site closing down almost! And him trying to run one of those syndicates again which he supposedly stole thousands of pounds of peoples money from last time…
Anyway beware and pass this word around every betting forum you know of. Get the word out about this and stop any innocent punters getting stung by these scoundrels.
cheers
SCAM! Rating:
James Fitzmaurice
The Commissioner
Filed under Betting System Reviews by on Apr 15th, 2010.