BETFAIR MIRACLE – FINAL REVIEW
Hi Bloggers
Well before I start it is unlikely that I would ever give 5 stars to any system or service as far as I am concerned there is no such thing as a perfect system or service this is my own personal opinion and I would be happy if one day I was proved to be wrong but somehow I doubt it. But I believe there is some very good systems or services but you just have to really search for it and I believe this is one of them.
How do I rate Betfair Miracle simply put four stars out of five, why because it delivers what it says on the tin and that is why I recommend it. Will it make you a instant fortune No, will it make you steady profits without giving you high blood Yes, is it short term No , is it long term Yes. Now the regular blogger’s should know me by now I will obviously be backing this up with some facts and figures, also I want to say that the author provided good customer service and only one e-mail went a stray during the 90 day trial this was due to a main computer problem. Not that you actually need the e-mail but it is provided free for the 21 days once you buy the system along with spreadsheets.
Right on to the results for the whole of the trial which remember does not include Sunday betting for both Main and Bonus Selections we had the following: (Note all profits quoted are to 1 point level stakes and Betfair commission of 5% is deducted)
Selections 63, Winning Lays 58 = Strike Rate 92.06 %, Profit 29.17 points,
Return on Investment 46.30%, Average Price of Losing Lay (BFSP) 6.24
So was this a flash in the pan, lets look at the results from June 7th 2007 to the day before the review started December 28th 2009, now although past results cannot guarantee the future results at least we can see if there is consistency:
Selections 652, Winning Lays 594 = Strike Rate 91.07%, Profit 301.41 points,
Return on Investment 46.38%, Average Price of Losing Lay (BFSP) 5.51
As you can see there no really dramatic differences except for the average losing lay price is abit higher this to me indicates a stable system, the longest losing run since June 2007 has been 3 and this has happened twice so far, with 2 consecutive losers eight times. As for winning runs it has 9 with over 20 consecutive winning lays including a 59, 41 and a 40. During the review the longest losing run was 1 and the longest winning run 26.
Actually there is a several occasions when the Bonus selection is the same as the Main Selection and we could class these as Bankers they have the best strike rate and the best ROI and actually puts the normal Bonus only selections in its place as the worse performer. For this one I have enclosed the results from June 2007 to the end of the trial:
Banker Selections: 141, Winning Lays 133 = Strike Rate 94.3%, Profit 94.30 points
Return on Investment 66.90%, Average Price of Losing Lay 5.00 (BFSP).
Normal Bonus Selections 124, Winning Lays 108 = S/R 87.1%, Profit 20.84 points,
Return on Investment 16.80%, Average Price of Losing Lays 6.11 (BFSP).
Clearly which ever way you go with this system you should make steady consistent profits but I like to wring out every last percentage of a system and my adaptation of this method would be to back only the Main and Banker Selections this would also be an ideal approach for fixed liability staking say 5 or 10% of the Bank with short losing runs, long winning runs and a slightly reduced BFSP odds on your losing lays as shown below.
Main/Banker Selections: 591, Winning Lays 544 = Strike Rate 92.08%,
Profits 310.74 points, ROI 52.57%, Average Price of Losing Lay 5.39
Conclusion
Whether you decide to back all the selections which when taking in all results from June 2007 to-date would give you an average profit of 9.75 points per month with around 21 selections average for a month, or the Main/Banker ones which produced just over 17 selections a month with an average of 9.14 points the system appears to be solid. Now there has been some debate in the past about the author quoting profits to ISP and not to BFSP and not deducting Betfair commission unfortunately he is not the only one who does this, although it was pain and it took many hours for me to convert the figures it still does not distract from the fact that BFM is a good system. Although it is hard to give 100% accurate figures I have calculated that there is around 11.1 % difference between BFSP and ISP, so when you add the 5% deduction for BF commission you end with deducting 16.1% from the profits shown at ISP. If it was a case that the ISP prices was necessary to keep the system in profit then I would have had serious doubts but as can be seen from previous quoted figures in this review which were to BFSP and commission deducted, they are very respectable.
I have seen on another site that they questioned about BFM betting on a Sunday and that the results for the system must have been bad so they did not include them, the answer lies in the fact that on Sundays there is limited information on each race on the RP website and this system uses the RP Basic membership, it is unwise to bet if you do not have all the info. For those who work during the day you can use a Bot to place the selections, if you do not you will have to check the Bookies odds just before the off to see whether the selection is a bet or not then lay with Betfair. So apart from having to be around near the time of a selections race or use a Bot the only other downside is subscribing to the Racing Post basic membership but there are a lot of systems using this so it just breaks down the cost if you add this one. The system the last time I looked a couple of days ago is available at 67 pounds which I think this is good value as the system seems to have sensible rules which should be relevant for quite a while, would I use BFM yes I fully intend to add this to a small but select portfolio of mine
Rating: 
Passed and Recommended!
Regards
Sgt Dave
Filed under Betting System Reviews, Passed and Recommended by on Apr 7th, 2010. 
Football Betting Tipsters – Click to see
19th March 2010 – End of Review - Rating: 
Coca-Cola League Championship
Newcastle United (at home to scunthorpe) Wednesday 17th March
Best Price: 1/3 (1.33 )
Recommended Bet: 150 points on Newcastle to Win. – WON +47.03 Points
Total for period = +47.03 Points
Cumulative P/L = +61.11 Points
Now this may seem like a lot of points profit for a 56 day time span but let me enlighten you a little.
We spent 2800 points to make 61 points profit. The average amount of your bank staked was 215 points per bet. This is very very high risk wagering.
I reported results using Betfair Prices so that means that i should show what average bets you will be making to make each profit.
For example we placed £2800 worth of bets in 56 days to make £61 profit? Seem reasonable? hardly!
The average bet made was £215 at averager odds of 1.2, making on average £43 profit if that bet won and losing £215 if it lost.
Purely on this basis of the high risks involvd with this service. It has failed a 56 day review.
Rating:
Betting system Guru
Filed under Betting System Reviews by on Mar 21st, 2010.
The Dutching Diamond Review Summary
Final Review Summary - Rating:
Although the Dutching Diamond has had a fantastic run and been
hyped up by another “rival” website, which had the audacity to use
my review even though it wasn’t complete, I still have doubts
about this system.
If we go back to basics, you will recall that we are backing
3 horses in every race, even down to a 5 horse race, in the hope
that one of them will win and produce a £10 profit each time.
My understanding of “dutching” is that you are normally backing
2 horses in a race not 3.
The only problem with this type of betting system is that the
normal stakes can be around £20 to £40 for a £10 return, which can
result in total wipeout if we hit a losing run. (The longest losing
run thus far has been one race)
The system itself is based on historical racing logic and results,
which do make sense and seem to come up with results on a regular basis.
Personally I find the checking process to establish the selections too
cumbersome and have always used the author’s low rate telephone
line, which gives the selections by 10am most days. In this way there
can be no doubt that the selections are correct.
If you want to go down the route of picking your own bets, you will
need a paid subscription to the racing post. The system can also be used
for Irish racing which is another plus factor.
The cost of the system is £99 which is not too onerous bearing in mind the
results achieved during the last 56 days.
Now I don’t want to “ditch” the dutching diamond, but I am not comfortable recommending a
system which has such a high risk factor. It may be that another review can be
undertaken in the future, but at the moment my own opinion is that this system
should be consigned to the Neutral Section (and I hope James agrees with me).
I will leave it up to you if you want to pay £99 and try out the selections for
yourself.
Days 53-56 Profit Total + 60 points
Using a profit margin of 15% and over, profit 462.61 pts profit. (Bank 1462.61 from a starting 1000 pts)
Rating: – [You can see The Dutching Diamond here...]
Philip
Filed under Betting System Reviews by on Mar 19th, 2010.